Àá½Ã¸¸ ±â´Ù·Á ÁÖ¼¼¿ä. ·ÎµùÁßÀÔ´Ï´Ù.

¾Ç°üÀýÀå¾Ö ȯÀÚÀÇ ÇϾǰñ ºñ´ëĪ¿¡ ´ëÇÑ ¹æ»ç¼±ÇÐÀû ¿¬±¸

A RADIOGRAPHIC STUDY OF THE MANDIBULAR ASYMMETRY IN TEMFOROMANDIBULAR DISORDER PATIENTS

Ä¡°ú¹æ»ç¼± 1990³â 20±Ç 2È£ p.201 ~ 210
¿À¼º±¹, À¯µ¿¼ö,
¼Ò¼Ó »ó¼¼Á¤º¸
¿À¼º±¹ (  ) - ¼­¿ï´ëÇб³
À¯µ¿¼ö (  ) - ¼­¿ï´ëÇб³ Ä¡°ú´ëÇÐ Ä¡°ú¹æ»ç¼±±³½Ç

Abstract

ÀúÀÚ´Â ¾Ç°üÀý Àå¾ÖÀÇ ¼Ò°ßÀ» °¡Áø ȯÀÚ 35¸í°ú ¾Ç°üÀý Àå¾ÖÀÇ º´·Â ¹× ÇöÁõÀÌ ¾ø´Â Á¤»ó
±³ÇÕÀÚ 35¸íÀ» Ç¥ÁØÈ­µÈ Á¶°ÇÇÏ¿¡¼­ ÃÔ¿µÇÏ¿© ¾ò¾îÁø ÈÄÀü¹æ µÎºÎ±Ô°Ý ¹æ»ç¼±»çÁø°ú µÎºÎÃà
¹æÇâ ¹æ»ç¼± »çÁøÀ» °èÃø ºÐ¼®ÇÏ¿© ´ÙÀ½°ú °°Àº °á°ú¸¦ ¾ò¾ú´Ù.
1. ÈÄÀü¹æ µÎºÎ±Ô°Ý ¹æ»ç¼±»çÁø¿¡¼­ Àüºñ±Ø°ú À̺Î(menton)¸¦ ÀÕ´Â ¼±ÀÌ Á¤Áß¼±°ú ÀÌ·ç´Â
°¢(MAP)Àº ȯÀÚ±º¿¡¼­ ´ëÁ¶±ºº¸´Ù Å« ¼öÄ¡¸¦ º¸¿´À¸¸ç ȯÀÚ±º°ú ´ëÁ¶±º°£¿¡ À¯ÀÇÇÑ Â÷ÀÌ
°¡ ÀÎÁ¤µÇ¾ú´Ù. (p<0.01)
2. µÎºÎÃà¹æÇâ ¹æ»ç¼± »çÁø¿¡¼­ ÀÌºÎ¿Í Ä¡»óµ¹±âÀÇ Á¤Á¡À» ÀÕ´Â ¼±ÀÌ Á¤Áß¼±°ú ÀÌ·ç´Â °¢
(MES), ¾çÂÊ ÇϾǰúµÎ ÃÖÈĹ濡¼­ À̺αîÁöÀÇ °Å¸®ÀÇ Â÷(DD), ¾ç ÇϾǰúµÎ Áß½ÉÀ¸·ÎºÎÅÍ
±âÁØ ¼öÆò¼±±îÁöÀÇ °Å¸®ÀÇ Â÷(DE), ¾ç ÇϾÇÂ÷µÎÀÇ ÀåÃàÀÌ ±âÁØ ¼öÆò¼±°ú ÀÌ·ç´Â °¢ÀÇ Â÷
(DCE), ¾ç ÇϾǰúµÎÀÇ ±æÀÌÀÇ Â÷(CL), ¾ç ÇϾǰúµÎÀÇ ÆøÀÇ Â÷(DW)´Â ȯÀÚ±º¿¡¼­ ´ëÁ¶±ºÅÏ
´Ù Å« ¼öÄ¡¸¦ º¸¿´À¸¸ç µÎ±º°£¿¡ À¯ÀÇÇÑ Â÷ÀÌ°¡ ÀÎÁ¤µÇ¾ú´Ù. (p<0.01)
3. ÈÄÀü¹æ µÎºÎ±Ô°Ý ¹æ»ç¼±»çÁø¿¡¼­ MAP¿Í ¾ç Çù°ñÀüµÎºÀÇÕ ¿ÜÃø¿¬¿¡¼­ ÇϾÇÀü¹æ¾Ç°¢
µ¹±âÀÇ Ãø¹æÇÏ¿¬±îÁöÀÇ ±æÀÌÀÇ Â÷(DH)´Â ¿ª»ó°ü°ü°è·Î ³ªÅ¸³µ´Ù.
4. µÎºÎÃà¹æÇâ ¹æ»ç¼± »çÁø¿¡¼­ MES¿Í DD, DE, DCE´Â ¿ª»ó°ü°ü°è·Î ³ªÅ¸³µ´Ù.
5. MAP¿Í MES´Â »ó°ü°ü°è°¡ ÀÖ¾ú´Ù. (p<0.01)
#ÃÊ·Ï#
The purpose of this study was to observe the relationship between mandibular
asymmetry and Temporomandibular Disorders by means of the cephalometry using the
posteroanterior cephalogram and the submentovertex cephalogram which were taken in
35 Temporomandibular Disorder patients and 35 normal persons ranged from 205 to 305.
The results were as follows :
1. The angulation which was formed by the median line with the ANS-Mention line
(MAP) was greater in patients group and there was statistically significant difference.
2. The angulation which was formed to the median line with the trenton-Odontoid
process tip line (MES), the difference of the distances firm the center of the posterior
surface of the both condyles to the most anterior point of the chin (DD), the difference
of the distances from the center of the both condyles to the horizontal reference line
(DE), the difference of the angulations which were formed by the both condyles axes
with the horizontal reference line (DCE), the difference of the lengths of the both
condyles (CL) and the difference of the widths of the both condyles (DW) were greater
in patients group and there were statistically significant differences.
3. There was reversed correlation between MAP and the difference of the distances
from the bilateral points of the lateral margin of the both zygomaticofrontal sutures to
the points at the lateral inferior margin of the both antegonial protuberances in mandible
(DH).
4. There was reversed correlation between MES and DD, DE, DCE.
5. There was correlation between MAP and MES.

Å°¿öµå

¿ø¹® ¹× ¸µÅ©¾Æ¿ô Á¤º¸

  

µîÀçÀú³Î Á¤º¸